TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 11 P36

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 11 P36 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT 337 hardship that may befall. . What is fair in one set of circumstances may be an act of tyranny in Lisenba v. California 314 . 219 236 contained the following rule for ascertaining what is meant by due process . as applied to a criminal trial denial of due process is the failure to observe that fundamental fairness essential to the very concept of justice. In order to declare a denial of it we must find that the absence of that fairness fatally infected the trial the acts complained of must be such quality as necessarily prevent a fair trial. In Mr. Justice Frankfurter s concurring opinion in Adamson v. California supra at 67 68 it was pointed out that judicial review of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment inescapably imposes upon this Court an exercise of judgment upon the whole course of the proceedings in order to ascertain whether they offend those canons of decency and fairness which express the notions of justice of English speaking peoples. These standards of justice are not authoritatively formulated anywhere as though they were prescriptions in a pharmacopoeia. Due process of law depends on circumstances. It varies with the subject matter and the necessities of the situation. Mr. Justice Holmes in Moyer v. Peabody 212 . 78 84 . The pattern of due process is picked out in the facts and circumstances of each case. Brock v. North Carolina 344 . 424 Hoagv. New Jersey supra. Other cases which discuss the necessity for an appraisal of the facts of each case in determining whether deprivation of counsel works a fundamental unfairness are Gibbs v. Burke 337 . 773 780 and Foster v. Illinois supra. In Palko v. Connecticut supra at 325 this Court summarized the previous cases which had contained discussions on the meaning of due process and stated that immunities contained in the specific amendments may be included in the concept of due process if found to be implicit in the concept of

• Lĩnh vực khác
• Từ điển ngành luật
• thuật ngữ pháp lý
• luật pháp Hoa Kỳ
• các đạo luật
• điều khoản pháp lý
• luật dân sự
• luật liên bang
• văn bản pháp luật
• tài liệu pháp lý
• Từ điển tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn theo chủ đề
• Tiếng Hàn căn bản
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về chuyên ngành Luật
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về xã hội