TAILIEUCHUNG - Cú pháp tiếng anh part 4

31 suppose that it has the function of a preclausal determiner (. a determiner introducing the following italicised clause Randy Rabbit runs Benny’s Bunny Bar) in sentences such as (49b). However, there is evidence against a determiner analysis of the complementiser that. Part of this is phonological in nature. In its use as a complementiser (in sentences such as (49b) above), that typically has the reduced form /ð¶t/, whereas in its use as a determiner (. in sentences such as (49a) above), that invariably has the unreduced form /ðæt/: the phonological differences between the two suggest that we are dealing. | 31 suppose that it has the function of a preclausal determiner . a determiner introducing the following italicised clause Randy Rabbit runs Benny s Bunny Bar in sentences such as 49b . However there is evidence against a determiner analysis of the complementiser that. Part of this is phonological in nature. In its use as a complementiser in sentences such as 49b above that typically has the reduced form ỗ t whereas in its use as a determiner . in sentences such as 49a above that invariably has the unreduced form ỗ t the phonological differences between the two suggest that we are dealing with two different lexical items here . two different words one of which functions as a complementiser and typically has a reduced vowel the other of which functions as a determiner and always has an unreduced vowel. Moreover that in its use as a determiner though not in its use as a complementiser can be substituted by another determiner such as this the cf. 50 a Nobody else knows about that incident this incident the incident determiner that b I m sure that it s true this it s true the it s true complementiser that Similarly the determiner that can be used pronominally without any complement whereas the complementiser that cannot cf. 51 a Nobody can blame you for that mistake prenominal determiner b Nobody can blame you for that pronominal determiner 52 a I m sure that you are right preclausal complementiser b I m sure that pronominal complementiser The clear phonological and syntactic differences between the two argue that the word that which serves to introduce complement clauses is a different item belonging to the category C complementiser from the determiner D that which modifies noun expressions. The third item which we earlier suggested might function as a complementiser in English is interrogative if. At first sight it might seem that there is a parallelism between if and interrogative wh-adverbs like when where whether since they appear to occupy the same .

TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.