TAILIEUCHUNG - Báo cáo khoa học: "ON THE SPATIAL USES OF PREPOSITIONS"

This paper shows the fallacy of this claim. It addresses the problem. It identifies and describes a number of object characteristics beyond shape (section I) and contextual factors ( s e c t i o n 2) which bear on these processes. Drawing on these d e s c r i p t i o n s , the t h i r d section proposes core meanings for two categories of . The l a s t section outlines the main d i r e c t i o n s of Inquiry suggested by the examples and. | ON THE SPATIAL USES OF PREPOSITIONS Annette Herskovlts Linguistics Department Stanford University At first glance the spatial uses of prepositions seem to constitute a good semantic domain for a computational approach. One expects such uses will refer more or less strictly to a closed explicit and precise chunk of world knowledge. Such an attitude Is expressed in the following statement Given descriptions of the shape of two objects given their location for example by means or coordinates in some system of reference and In sone cases the location of an observer one can select an appropriate preposition. This paper shows the fallacy of this claim. It addresses the problem of Interpreting and generating locative predications expressions made up of two noun-phrases governed by a preposition used spatially . It identifies and describes a number of object characteristics beyond shape section 1 and contextual factors section 2 which bear on these processes. Drawing on these descriptions the third section proposes core meanings for two categories of prepositions and describes some of the transformations these core meanings are subject to In context. The last section outlines the main directions of Inquiry suggested by the examples and observations In the paper. 1. OBJECT CHARACTERISTICS Throughout the paper I use the term object meaning strictly speaking the object together with some lexical label. In effect the choice of preposition depends on the lexical category associated with the object by the noun-phrase used to refer to It. And such a category Is not uniquely defined. There are different levels In the categorization hierarchy e. g. end table table piece of furniture but also different perspectives on the object. Consider the picture below. That patch of grass could be referred to alternately as a front-yard a lawn gran a patch of gran etc. to assume that these phrases refer to the same object one must see the gratt as a metonymic substitute for thit patch of gran .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.