TAILIEUCHUNG - State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation

Tham khảo sách 'state liability in investment treaty arbitration: global constitutional and administrative law in the bit generation', kinh tế - quản lý, luật phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | Investment Treaty Arbitration Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation Santiago Montt STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW STATE LIABILITY IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION Today there are more than 2 500 bilateral investment treaties BITs around the world. Most of these investment protection treaties offer foreign investors a direct cause of action to claim damages against host-states before international arbitral tribunals. This procedure together with the requirement of compensation in indirect expropriations and the fair and equitable treatment standard have transformed the way we think about state liability in international law. We live in the BIT generation a world where BITs define the scope and conditions according to which states are economically accountable for the consequences of regulatory change and administrative action. Investment arbitration in the BIT generation carries new functions which pose unprecedented normative challenges such as the arbitral bodies established to resolve investor state disputes defining the relationship between property rights and the public interest. They also review state action for arbitrariness and define the proper tests under which that review should proceed. State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration is an interdisciplinary work aimed at academics and practitioners which focuses on five key dimensions of BIT arbitration. First it analyses the past practice of state responsibility for injuries to aliens placing the BIT generation in historical perspective. Second it develops a descriptive law-and-economics model that explains the proliferation of BITs and why they are all worded so similarly. Third it addresses the legitimacy deficits of this new form of dispute settlement weighing its potential advantages and democratic shortfalls. Fourth it gives a comparative overview of the universal tension between property rights and the public interest and the problems and challenges associated with .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.