TAILIEUCHUNG - The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Part 132

The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Part 132. In the past decade, Cognitive Linguistics has developed into one of the most dynamic and attractive frameworks within theoretical and descriptive linguistics The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics is a major new reference that presents a comprehensive overview of the main theoretical concepts and descriptive/theoretical models of Cognitive Linguistics, and covers its various subfields, theoretical as well as applied. | 1280 CHRIS SINHA formats must play a crucial part in linguistic conceptualization. The recent turn to an embodied cognitive science Lakoff and Johnson 1999 requires us in the spirit of Kohler to abandon the idea of neat dividing lines between perception cognition and action Clark 1997 xiii . Buhler would still however have maintained that embodied action and perception is not the whole story of symbolization and that in order to understand this we need to move beyond the individual organism. . Representation and Symbolization Representation is perhaps the most important and most contested foundational concept in modern cognitive science. Cognitive Linguistics takes the view that linguistic structure is motivated by conceptual representation and communicative function thereby placing the representational function of language at the center of its concerns. As a usage-based theory of language Cognitive Linguistics rejects the strict dichotomy in traditional Saussurean linguistics between langue and parole as well as the generative linguistic postulate of the autonomy of syntax. Cognitive Linguistics though distinctive new and unparalleled in earlier linguistic theories in terms of its detailed working-out of the cognitive-functional perspective has many precursors in linguistic theory Nerlich and Clarke this volume chapter 22 one of which in particular the Sprachtheorie language theory of Buhler 1934 1990 deserves special attention as a full-fledged linguistically sophisticated psychology of language. Buhler rejected langue as the basis for psychology of language though not as a basis for linguistic description which he considered to be a necessary precondition for a psychology of language. He viewed speaking as representational action and language as the mediating vehicle of such action elaborating this general perspective in the Organon Tool Vehicle model of linguistic His best-known contribution to linguistic theory was the formulation of a .

• Chính trị học
• Cẩm nang ngôn ngữ học
• lý thuyết ngôn ngữ học
• giáo trình Oxford
• ngôn ngữ học nhận thức
• lý thuyết và ứng dụng
• Tài liệu ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• giáo trình ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• bài giảng ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• cẩm nang ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• quan hệ của ngôn ngữ học