TAILIEUCHUNG - Criminal Law Library Volume 1: Self-Defence in Criminal Law

This book combines a careful philosophical discussion of the rationale justifying self-defence together with detailed discussions of the range of statutory selfdefence requirements, as well as discussions of numerous other relevant issues (ie, putative self-defence, excessive self-defence, earlier guilt, battered women). The book argues that before formulating definitions for each aspect of self-defence (necessity, proportionality, retreat, immediacy, mental element, etc.) it is imperative to determine the proper rationale for self-defence and, only then, to derive the appropriate solutions. The first part of the book therefore contains an in-depth discussion of the rationale for self-defence: why society does not just excuse. | SELF-DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL LAW This book combines a careful philosophical discussion of the rationale justifying self-defence together with detailed discussions of the range of statutory selfdefence requirements as well as discussions of numerous other relevant issues ie putative self-defence excessive self-defence earlier guilt battered women . The book argues that before formulating definitions for each aspect of self-defence necessity proportionality retreat immediacy mental element etc. it is imperative to determine the proper rationale for self-defence and only then to derive the appropriate solutions. The first part of the book therefore contains an in-depth discussion of the rationale for self-defence why society does not just excuse the actor from criminal liability but rather justifies his act. The author critically analyses theories that have been proposed up to the present including the culpability of the aggressor the autonomy of the attacked person protection of the social-legal order balancing interests and choice of the lesser evil etc. points out the weaknesses of each theory and then proposes a new theory that explains the rationale behind the justification of self-defence. The new rationale proposed is that for the full justification of self-defence a balance of interests must be struck that takes into account the expected physical injury to the attacked person in the absence of defensive action vis-a-vis the expected physical injury to the aggressor as a result of defensive action as well as all of the relevant abstract factors which are threefold the autonomy of the attacked person the culpability of the aggressor and the social-legal order. The author demonstrates how ignoring one or more of these factors leads to erroneous results. In the chapters following the book shows that the proposed rationale can be applied to develop convincing solutions for the various questions raised. Volume 1 in the Criminal Law Library series Criminal Law Library .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.