TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 13 P48

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 13 P48 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | 456 CIVIL RIGHTS PRIMARY DOCUMENTS NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS WORCESTER V. THE STATE OF GEORGIA acts of violence which were often attended by reciprocal murder. The Indians perceived in this protection only what was beneficial to themselves an engagement to punish aggressions on them. It involved practically no claim to their lands no dominion over their persons. It merely bound the nation to the British crown as a dependent ally claiming the protection of a powerful friend and neighbor and receiving the advantages of that protection without involving a surrender of their national character. This is the true meaning of the stipulation and is undoubtedly the sense in which it was made. Neither the British government nor the Cherokees ever understood it otherwise. The same stipulation entered into with the United States is undoubtedly to be construed in the same manner. They receive the Cherokee Nation into their favor and protection. The Cherokees acknowledge themselves to be under the protection of the United States and of no other power. Protection does not imply the destruction of the protected. The manner in which this stipulation was understood by the American government is explained by the language and acts of our first President. The fourth article draws the boundary between the Indians and the citizens of the United States. But in describing this boundary the term alloted and the term hunting ground are used. Is it reasonable to suppose that the Indians who could not write and most probably could not read who certainly were not critical judges of our languages should distinguish the word alloted from the words marked out. The actual subject of contract was the dividing line between the two nations and their attention may very well be supposed to have been confined to that subject. When in fact they were ceding lands to the United States and describing the extent of their cession it may very well be supposed that they might not understand the term employed as .

• Lĩnh vực khác
• Từ điển ngành luật
• thuật ngữ pháp lý
• luật pháp Hoa Kỳ
• các đạo luật
• điều khoản pháp lý
• luật dân sự
• luật liên bang
• văn bản pháp luật
• tài liệu pháp lý
• Từ điển tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn theo chủ đề
• Tiếng Hàn căn bản
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về chuyên ngành Luật
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về xã hội