TAILIEUCHUNG - The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Part 24

The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Part 24. In the past decade, Cognitive Linguistics has developed into one of the most dynamic and attractive frameworks within theoretical and descriptive linguistics The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics is a major new reference that presents a comprehensive overview of the main theoretical concepts and descriptive/theoretical models of Cognitive Linguistics, and covers its various subfields, theoretical as well as applied. | 200 JOSEPH E. GRADy Figure . Diagram of the Leonardo da Vinci s Mona Lisa Lewinski blend itself is not represented in the blend the ship image takes its place but maintains its conceptual linkage with the state in the target input space . It is this fusion with accommodation that leads to the mental experience which Lakoff and Johnson 1980 5 describe as understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another. A noteworthy advance of blending theory is that it allows analysts a way of describing examples in which the metaphorical image cannot be a straightforward projection of source onto target. Following Coulson 2001 Fauconnier and Turner 1998 discuss examples of the common English idiom digging one s own grave which map imagery from the domain of death and burial onto scenarios involving nonlethal failure of various The key point from the blending analyst s point of view is that digging a grave one s own or anyone else s does not cause death yet instances of the idiom always refer to scenarios in which people cause themselves harm through their own actions. The causal structure of the source space is not projected into the blend instead the blended space contains the causal structure of the target domain and the imagined scenario is one that would make no sense within the logic of the source input. The blending framework is obviously more powerful than CMT for describing such Within a blending account METAPHOR 201 we can say that particular elements from each domain are counterparts . failure and death and we can identify source and target but we can also describe the overall structure of the resulting conceptualization which draws in complex ways from both. The blending framework also makes it straightforward to record ways in which multiple metaphorical patterns are combined within a single complex conceptualization. For example while the conventional understanding of nations as ships has nothing to say about right-left or .

• Ngôn ngữ học
• Cẩm nang ngôn ngữ học
• lý thuyết ngôn ngữ học
• giáo trình Oxford
• ngôn ngữ học nhận thức
• lý thuyết và ứng dụng
• Tài liệu ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• giáo trình ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• bài giảng ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• cẩm nang ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• quan hệ của ngôn ngữ học