TAILIEUCHUNG - Genetics and Life Insurance : A Comparative Analysis

In recent years, the Court invalidated two con- gressional statutes that attempted to regulate non- economic activities. In United States v. Lopez (1995), it struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act, which attempted to reach the activity of possessing a gun within a thousand feet of a school. In United States v. Morrison (2000), it invalidated part of the Violence Against Women Act, which regulated gen- der-motivated violence. Because the Court found the regulated activity in each case to be non- economic, it was outside the reach of Congress’s Commerce power, regardless of its effect on inter- state commerce. To uphold the insurance purchase mandate, the Supreme Court would have to concede. | Genetics and Life Insurance A Comparative Analysis Trudo Lemmens 1 Yann Joly 2 Bartha M. Knoppers 3 1 Assistant Professor Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2 Research Associate Université de Montréal Coordinator Canadian Task Force on Genetics and the Life Insurance 3 Canadian Research Chair in Law and Medicine Professor Université de Montréal Abstract The debate surrounding the role of life insurance the necessity of risk rating and the notion of acceptable discrimination has raised questions about the larger social role of insurance. Recent developments in the field of genetics allowing insurers to make use of genetic testing technology as a new underwriting tool have reinvigorated this debate. This article presents a comparative study of positions taken in countries on issues in genetics and life insurance. We will analyze the 43 selected countries and comment on their potential for ensuring a more equitable access for life insurance applicants. Introduction Life insurance is a private contract between the policyholder and the insurer. It is designed to provide financial protection to beneficiaries in the event of the death of the insured. To calculate the amount of the premium insurers use information such as age sex health status and lifestyle factors as well as some information on the applicant s familial health history. The insured will then be assigned to a group comprised of people with similar risk factors. By its very nature then the process of underwriting discriminates between individuals on the basis of individual and familial characteristics This discriminatory component of the insurance contract is at the center of the dilemma. Insurers currently have the possibility of using genetic information for insurance underwriting. While insurers invoke the mutuality principle underlying the private life insurance contract as well as the risks of antiselection ii to justify their access to genetic information patients groups and human rights activists .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.