TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 12 P35

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 12 P35 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN 327 Undoubtedly the demonstrable falsity of the statements prevented pleas of truth or privilege or fair comment. Indeed the Times published a retraction of the same paragraphs for Governor Patterson on May 16 1960 R. 596 and 19581961 Since publication of the advertisement The Times made an investigation and consistent with its policy of retracting and correcting any errors or misstatements which may appear in its columns herewith retracts the two paragraphs complained of by the Governor. The Times asked its Montgomery string correspondent McKee for an investigation. On April 14 1960 five days before suit was filed McKee advised that the statements in the first quoted paragraph of the ad were false and that King had been arrested twice by the Montgomery police for loitering and speeding and twice by the Sheriff s office for violation of the State boycott law and on charge of income tax falsification a charge on which he was subsequently acquitted. Nevertheless the Times instead of retracting wrote respondent that with the exception of the padlocking statement the rest of the quoted material was substantially correct R. 589 . Later the Times directed another investigation by its regional correspondent Claude Sitton. While the Times now speaks in this Court of discrepancies and inaccuracies in two instances Sitton reported on May 4 1960 that the first quoted paragraph of the advertisement appears to be virtually without any foundation R. 594 . There was no suggestion of involvement of respondent or any other city commissioner or public employee under their charge in the matters in the second quoted paragraph. The Times then retracted for Governor Patterson but not for respondent. The Times attempted to explain its inconsistency The defendant . felt that on account of the fact that John Patterson held the high office of Governor of the State of Alabama and that he apparently believed that he had been libeled by said .

TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.