TAILIEUCHUNG - The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Part 41

The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics Part 41. In the past decade, Cognitive Linguistics has developed into one of the most dynamic and attractive frameworks within theoretical and descriptive linguistics The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics is a major new reference that presents a comprehensive overview of the main theoretical concepts and descriptive/theoretical models of Cognitive Linguistics, and covers its various subfields, theoretical as well as applied. | 370 GILLES FAUCONNIER future time in 11 the present tense corresponds to past events in 12 the past tense corresponds to a present time in 13 the past tense corresponds to a future time and in 14 the future tense corresponds to a present time. 10 a. The boat leaves next week. b. When he comes tomorrow I ll tell him about the party. c. If I see him next week I ll ask him to call you. 11 a. I m walking down the street one day when suddenly this guy walks up to me. b. He catches the ball. He runs. He makes a touchdown. morning-after sports report 12 a. Do you have a minute I wanted to ask you a question. b. I wish I lived closer to my family now. c. If I had time now I would help you. 13 a. If I had the time next week I would go to your party. b. I can t go to the concert tonight. You ll have to tell me how it was. 14 a. That will be all for now. b. He s not on the train. He will have missed it. More generally tenses are used not just to reflect local time relations between neighboring spaces but also to reflect epistemic distance that is whether a space is hypothetical or counterfactual with respect to its parent space. The coding system remains the same and a particular tense sequence may reflect both time and epi-stemic distance. Here are some examples offered by Sweetser 1996 323 15 a. If you have Triple-A then if you go to a telephone you can solve your problem. b. If you had Triple-A then if you went to a telephone you could solve your problem. c. If you had had Triple-A then if you d gone to a telephone you could have solved your problem. We can interpret all three as referring to present time but with different epistemic stances. The first is neutral as to the chances that you have Triple-A. The second suggests that maybe you do not have it. And the third is counterfactual you do not have Triple-A but if you did. Alternatively one could interpret the second sentence as referring to a past event and being neutral as to what happened and as to whether you had .

• Ngôn ngữ học
• Cẩm nang ngôn ngữ học
• lý thuyết ngôn ngữ học
• giáo trình Oxford
• ngôn ngữ học nhận thức
• lý thuyết và ứng dụng
• Tài liệu ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• giáo trình ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• bài giảng ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• nghiên cứu ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• cẩm nang ngôn ngữ học cấu trúc
• quan hệ của ngôn ngữ học