TAILIEUCHUNG - Báo cáo khoa học: "Parsing into Discourse Object Descriptions"

This paper reports work on the design of a natural language interface with a limited dialogue capability. It is argued that (i) The interpretation of the input is preferably represented as a structure of Discourse Object Descriptions (DODs); (ii) The DODs must be determined on the basis of different types of knowledge such as grammatical knowledge, object type deirmitions and knowledge about existing discourse objects and their discourse status; (iii) The different types of knowledge are stored separately but integrated in the interpretation process which is based on constraints. . | Parsing into Discourse Object Descriptions Lars Ahrenberg Department of Computer and Information Science Linkõping University s - 581 83 Linkõping ABSTRACT This paper reports work on the design of a natural language interface with a limited dialogue capability. It is argued that i The interpretation of the input is preferably represented as a structure of Discourse Object Descriptions DODs ii The DODs must be determined on the basis of different types of knowledge such as grammatical knowledge object type definitions and knowledge about existing discourse objects and theữ discourse status iii The different types of knowledge are stored separately but integrated in the interpretation process which is based on constraints. INTRODUCTION The LINLIN-project is concerned with the development of general-purpose natural language interfaces NLIs to computer software with special emphasis on communication in Swedish. A useful general-purpose NLĨ must meet a variety of requirements a number of which concern communicative ability. The communicative abilities of an NLI are necessarily restricted by the limitations of existing techniques but can also be purposely restricted to enhance transparency. It is not certain that the linguistically more competent NLI is the most useful one . if its behaviour appears idiosyncratic to the user. In any case the language of an NLI is a language designed and is in that respect not a natural language so there are many questions to be answered about how it should be designed both in terms of how it should function as a vehicle of communication and in terms of internal representations and procedures. As for the first aspect we are conducting a series of simulations to find out what communicative abilities an NLI should have Dahlback Jonsson 1986 but meanwhile we are assuming that LINLIN should meet the following demands it should have a fair knowledge of the structure of Swedish words clauses and utterances an This work is part of the project

• Báo cáo khoa học
• Parsing into Discourse
• Object Descriptions
• Lars Ahrenberg
• scientific reports
• model language
• process natural language
• Text level Discourse Parsing
• Rich Linguistic Features
• Long Papers
• báo cáo khoa học
• báo cáo ngôn ngữ
• ngôn ngữ tự nhiên
• Dialog Control
• Natural Language System
• Dialog Control in a Natural Language System
• Expanding the Horizons
• Natural Language Interfaces
• Phil Hayes
• PROSPECTS OR PRACTICAL
• NATURAL LANGUAGE SYSTEMS
• Workshops
• NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERACTION WITH MACHINES
• COMPUTER INTEBFACE DESIGN MURRAY TUROFF DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER
• IiVFORMATION SCIENCE IIEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
• EVALUATION OF NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASE SYSTEMS
• A PANEL DISCUSSION
• database query system
• J
• Norwood Crout
• INTERFACES TO DATA BASE SYSTEMS
• Bozena Henisz
• INTERPRETING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• DATABASE UPDATES
• S
• Jermld Kaplan Jim David
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE
• INTERFACES TO DATABASES
• Gary G
• Hendrlx and William H
• Lewis
• DATABASES THEORETICAL
• TECHNICAL ISSUES
• TRANSPORTABLE NATURAL LANGUAGE INTERFACES
• PROBLEMS AND TECHNIQUES
• Barbara J
• Grosz
• THEORETICAL TECHNICAL ISSUES
• NATURAL LANGUAGE ACCESS TO DATABASES
• R
• Petrick
• Domain Independent
• Database Access Systems
• ISSUES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE
• ACCESS TO DATABASES
• A LOGIC PROGRAMMING PERSPECTIVE
• Sharon C
• Salveter David Maier
• PLANNING NATURAL LANGUAGE
• EXPRESSIONS REFERRING
• Douglas E
• Appelt
• THE TEXT SYSTEM
• NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION
• Kathleen R
• M
• MENTING A DATABASE
• KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION
• THE KEY TO THE SELECTION PROBLEM
• E
• Jeffrey Conklin David D
• McDonald
• A KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING
• Stuart C
• Shapiro
• NATURAL LANGUAGE TEXTS
• NECESSARILY GRAMMATICAL
• EVEN COMPLETE
• UNGRAMHATICALITY
• EXTRA GRAMMATICALITY
• NATURAL LANGUAGE UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMS
• Taxonomy
• Descriptions
• Individuals in Natural
• Language Understanding
• The Use of Ooject Special Knowledge
• Natural Language Processing
• Mark H
• Bursteln