TAILIEUCHUNG - Master the Gre 2010 - Part 16

Peterson's Master the Gre 2010 - Part book includes 9 full-length practice tests , thorough reviews of every section on the exam, and expert tips and strategies from a test prep pro. GRE (Graduage Record Examination General Test) is a commercially-run standardized test and an admission requirement for many graduate schools in USA and other English-speaking countries. GRE can earn you between 200-800 points. | Chapter 5 The Argument Task 133 What if you think you won t have enough time to provide supporting detail for each point of critique Don t despair. Look for two or three points that are related to the same item of evidence for example those involving the same statistical survey . Then plan to touch briefly on each one in the same par agraph. Grouping them together will make sense to the reader who may not notice what s missing as much as the fact that you re very organized. Don t Look for the Fatal Flaw Avoid dwelling on one particular flaw that you think is the most serious one or on one realistic example or counterexample that you think if true would spell certain death for the entire Argument. If you do you ll risk running out of time. Instead treat every problem as a contributing cause. Don t bother trying to rank flaws as more or less serious either. True one particular flaw might be more damaging to an Argument than others. But by identifying it as the most serious problem with the Argument you re committing yourself to defending this claim above all others. Do you really have time for this kind of analysis No Nor does the GRE reader expect or want this from you. In short you re best off applying equal treatment to each of the Argument s problems. There s No Need to Impress with Technical Terminology Scholars in the academic fields of Critical Reasoning and Logic rely on all manner of formal terminology for the kinds of reasoning flaws you ll find in GRE Arguments. For example post hoc reasoning refers to a faulty construct best described as after this therefore because of this reasoning. You won t score any points with GRE readers by tossing around such terminology in your Argument essay however. Besides if you use a technical term you should define it for the reader and this only consumes precious time. Go with the Logical Flow Try to organize your points of critique to reflect the Argument s line of reasoning from its evidence and assumptions to its .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.