TAILIEUCHUNG - Critical Care Obstetrics part 70

Critical Care Obstetrics part 70 provides expert clinical guidance throughout on how you can maximize the chances of your patient and her baby surviving trauma. In this stimulating text, internationally recognized experts guide you through the most challenging situations you as an obstetrician are likely to face, enabling you to skillfully:Recognize conditions early-on which might prove life threatening, Implement immediate life-saving treatments in emergency situations, Maximize the survival prospects of both the mother and her fetus | Ethics in the Obstetric Critical Care Setting entitled to the law s protection and that blood could be given if necessary to save her life or the life of her child as the physician in charge at the time may determine 78 Raleigh Fitkin- Paul Morgan Hospital vs Anderson 77 as described in 75 . This case determined that the First Amendment embodied two freedoms the freedom to believe and the freedom to act on those beliefs. The court held that only the first of these two concepts is absolute. The second concept in this case is limited by the child s right to live 75 . This case has been criticized for the shortness of the opinion and the fact that the judgment was not enacted because the patient left the hospital 78 . In re Jamaica Hospital in 1985 the New York Supreme Court addressed the issue of a Jehovah s Witness who was 18 weeks pregnant and bleeding extensively from esophageal varices 79 . The mother refused blood. She was noted to be the single mother of 10 children with her only relative being a sister who was unavailable at the time. The court allowed the transfusion to protect the fetus 37 . It decided that a person does have the right to refuse medical treatment but that the state is permitted under Roe vs Wade to interfere with reproductive choices when it has a compelling interest. The court acknowledged that in the case of a non-viable fetus the interest is not compelling but rather significant. This interest was felt to outweigh the patient s right to refuse a blood transfusion and she was ordered to receive blood re Jamaica Hospital 1985 79 as presented in Mohaupt Sharma 1998 40 . In the Georgetown Hospital case the court also ordered a transfusion for a non-pregnant woman who was the sole provider for a 7- month- old child. This decision aimed to prevent child abuse and abandonment Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College Hospital 80 as presented in Elkins 1994 75 . There have been inconsistent decisions involving patients .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.