TAILIEUCHUNG - About the choice of a plastic-like model for shape memory alloys

The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of the choice of plasticity theory-inspired model in the prediction of the shape of phase transformation domains. In this field a comparison is made between Huber-Von Mises based model and an another integrating the non-symmetry between tension and compression. The yield surface of phase transformation initiation for an homogeneous body under proportional biaxial loading is discussed. | Vietnam Journal of Mechanics, VAST, Vol. 33, No. 4 (2011), pp. 283 – 291 ABOUT THE CHOICE OF A PLASTIC-LIKE MODEL FOR SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS C. Lexcellent, R. M. Laydi Département DMA, FEMTO-ST (UMR CNRS 6174) University of Franche-Comté, France Abstract. The aim of this paper is to examine the impact of the choice of plasticity theory-inspired model in the prediction of the shape of phase transformation domains. In this field a comparison is made between Huber-Von Mises based model and an another integrating the non-symmetry between tension and compression. The yield surface of phase transformation initiation for an homogeneous body under proportional biaxial loading is discussed. A transport of these surfaces in the space of the "effective transformation strain of martensite tensor" is given. Key words: Shape memory alloys, phase change, elastic-plastic models, multiaxial behavior. 1. INTRODUCTION The thermomechanical behavior of shape memory alloys SMA can be considered as surprizing towards elasto-plastic classical materials. Two mechanisms can be involved in its loading response . (i) a phase transformation between a mother phase called austenite (generally cubic) and a product phase called martensite (orthorhombic, monoclinic, tetragonal. . . ) (ii) a reorientation process of the martensite platelets. The phase transformation induced by stress action is called "pseudo-elasticity" and the reorientation from self accommodating martensite variants to stress induced ones is said "pseudo-plasticity". Apparently on loading, for instance, the tensile curve σ ↔ ε are the sames than the ones for elastoplastic materials but not the mechanisms involved. The differentiation comes on unloading. For SMA pseudo-elasticity, the behavior is reversible mechanically and irreversible for elasto-plastic (presence of residual plastic strain at stress free state). The comparison on unloading between pseudo-plastic and elasto-plastic material is the presence of caoutchoutic .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.