Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Reduction in second party system audits Currently a supplier supplying customers in the USA, France, Italy, and Germany may be subject to audit by one or more of their customers because of the customer s lack of confidence in quality assurance schemes other than its own. Hence a QS-9000 registered supplier that supplies both Ford USA and BMW Germany could be subject to a VDA 6.1 audit, as the two standards are different. By the USA, Germany, France, UK, and Italy agreeing a common standard and the associated registration scheme, registration to ISO/TS 16949. | The origins 17 Failure modes analysis Statistical process control Measurement systems analysis Employee motivation On-the-job training Efficiency will increase through common application of requirements for Continuous improvement in cost Continuous improvement in productivity Employee motivation On-the-job training Measurement and review of product realization stages Use of common tools for FMEA SPC MSA Reduction in second party system audits Currently a supplier supplying customers in the USA France Italy and Germany may be subject to audit by one or more of their customers because of the customer s lack of confidence in quality assurance schemes other than its own. Hence a QS-9000 registered supplier that supplies both Ford USA and BMW Germany could be subject to a VDA 6.1 audit as the two standards are different. By the USA Germany France UK and Italy agreeing a common standard and the associated registration scheme registration to ISO TS 16949 is recognized by all the manufactures that are members of IATF These organizations will therefore not find it necessary to perform any further quality system audits of ISO TS 16949 registered suppliers. 18 The origins Reduction in multiple third party registrations Currently a supplier supplying customers in the USA and Europe needs to seek certification to QS-9000 and either VDA 6.1 AVSQ 94 or EAQF 94. Within Europe certification to any one of the three European quality system requirements is at least in theory recognized by customers in the other countries. Common language to improve understanding of quality system requirements A common language in quality system requirements is achieved through a common standard. The baseline language of the standard is English and all translations should be made from English to the other language thereby minimizing scope for error. However it is common to find that terms in one language do not have the same meaning in another language. Hopefully through the deliberations of the IATF .
