Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Lessons from the evaluation of the UK's NHS R&D Implementation Methods Programme | BioMed Central Implementation Science Research article Open Access Lessons from the evaluation of the UK s NHS R D Implementation Methods Programme Bryony Soper and Stephen R Hanney Address Health Economics Research Group Brunel University Uxbridge Middlesex UK Email Bryony Soper - bryonyrowe@tiscali.co.uk Stephen R Hanney - stephen.hanney@brunel.ac.uk Corresponding author Published 19 February 2007 Received 14 July 2006 Implementation Science 2007 2 7 doi 10.1186 1748-5908-2-7 Accepted 19 February 2007 This article is available from http www.implementationscience.cOm content 2 1 7 2007 Soper and Hanney licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Concern about the effective use of research was a major factor behind the creation of the NHS R D Programme in 1991. In 1994 an advisory group was established to identify research priorities in research implementation. The Implementation Methods Programme IMP flowed from this and its commissioning group funded 36 projects. In 2000 responsibility for the programme passed to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R D which asked the Health Economics Research Group HERG Brunel University to conduct an evaluation in 2002. By then most projects had been completed. This evaluation was intended to cover the quality of outputs lessons to be learnt about the communication strategy and the commissioning process and the benefits from the projects. Methods We adopted a wide range of quantitative and qualitative methods. They included documentary analysis interviews with key actors questionnaires to the funded lead researchers questionnaires to potential users and desk analysis. Results Quantitative assessment of outputs and .
