Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Association of intervention outcomes with practice capacity for change: Subgroup analysis from a group randomized trial | Implementation Science BioMed Central Open Access Short report Association of intervention outcomes with practice capacity for change Subgroup analysis from a group randomized trial David Litaker 1 2 Mary Ruhe3 Sharon Weyer3 4 and Kurt C Stange3 5 Address Department of Medicine Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center Cleveland Ohio USA 2Mannheim Institute for Public Health Social and Preventive Medicine University of Heidelberg Germany 3Department of Family Medicine Research Division Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA 4Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA and 5Department of Sociology Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA Email David Litaker - David.Litaker@va.gov Mary Ruhe - Mary.Ruhe@case.edu Sharon Weyer - Sharon.Weyer@case.edu Kurt C Stange - Kurt.Stange@case.edu Corresponding author Published 16 May 2008 Received 30 March 2007 Implementation Science 2008 3 25 doi l0.ll86 l748-5908-3-25 Accepted 16 May 2008 This article is available from http www.implementationscience.cOm content 3 1 25 2008 Litaker et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract_ Background The relationship between health care practices capacity for change and the results and sustainability of interventions to improve health care delivery is unclear. Methods In the setting of an intervention to increase preventive service delivery PSD we assessed practice capacity for change by rating motivation to change and instrumental ability to change on a one to four scale. After combining these ratings into a single score random effects models tested its association with change in