Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Tuyển tập báo cáo các nghiên cứu khoa học quốc tế ngành y học dành cho các bạn tham khảo đề tài: Adapting HIV prevention evidence-based interventions in practice settings: an interview study | BioMed Central Implementation Science Research article Open Access Adapting HIV prevention evidence-based interventions in practice settings an interview study Rosemary C Veniegas 1 Uyen H Kao1 and Ricki Rosales2 Address 1UCLA Department of Family Medicine and Center for HIV Identification Prevention and Treatment Services Los Angeles CA USA and 2City of Los Angeles AIDS Coordinator s Office Los Angeles CA USA Email Rosemary C Veniegas - rveniegas@mednet.ucla.edu Uyen H Kao - ukao@mednet.ucla.edu Ricki Rosales - Ricky.Rosales@lacity.org Corresponding author Published 23 November 2009 Received 30 December 2008 . r r Accepted 23 November 2009 Implementation Science 2009 4 76 doi 10.1186 1748-5908-4-76 This article is available from http wwwjmplementationscience.com contentM 1 76 2009 Veniegas et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background Evidence-based interventions that are being delivered in real-world settings are adapted to enhance the external validity of these interventions. The purpose of this study was to examine multiple intervention adaptations made during pre-implementation implementation maintenance and evolution phases of human immunodeficiency virus HIV prevention technology transfer. We examined two important categories of adaptations -- modifications to key characteristics such as activities or delivery methods of interventions and reinvention of the interventions including addition and deletion of core elements. Methods Study participants were thirty-four community-based organization staff who were implementing evidence-based interventions in Los Angeles California. Participants were interviewed twice and interviews were professionally transcribed. Transcriptions were coded by two