Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Tuyển tập các báo cáo nghiên cứu về hóa học được đăng trên tạp chí sinh học quốc tế đề tài : The results of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears at mid-term follow-up | BioMed Central Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Research article Open Access The results of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears at mid-term follow-up Albert W Pearsall IY f Khalid A Ibrahimt and Sudhakar G Madanagopak Address Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USA Email AlbertW Pearsall - apearsal@usouthal.edu KhalidA Ibrahim - khalidhamid8@yahoo.com Sudhakar G Madanagopal - smadanagopal@usouthal.edu Corresponding author tEqual contributors Published I December 2007 Received 21 February 2007 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2007 2 24 doi 10.1186 1749-799X-2-24 Accepted I December 2007 This article is available from http www.josr-online.com content 2 I 24 2007 Pearsall et al licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http creativecommons.Org licenses by 2.0 which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background To prospectively evaluate patients who underwent a mini-open repair versus a completely arthroscopic technique for small to large size rotator cuff tears. Methods Fifty-two patients underwent mini-open or all arthroscopic repair of a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff. Patients who complained of shoulder pain and or weakness and who had failed a minimum of 6 weeks of physical therapy and had at least one sub-acromial injection were surgical candidates. Pre and post-operative clinical evaluations included the following 1 demographics 2 Simple Shoulder Test SST 3 University of California Los Angeles UCLA rating scale 4 visual analog pain assessment VAS and 5 pre-op SF12 assessment. Descriptive analysis was performed for patient demographics and for all variables. Pre and post outcome scores range of motion and pain scale were compared using paired t-tests. Analysis of variance ANOVA was used to .
