Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Thiết kế bền vững dựa trên đánh giá của hàng hoá và dịch vụ thông tin mà chỉ có thể được tích lũy thông qua các nỗ lực kết hợp của nhiều người quen thuộc với chuỗi cung ứng. Việc công bố của các nhà cung cấp và quy trình là một thực tế cho nhiều ngành công nghiệp nơi mà nó phục vụ để đảm bảo chất lượng và củng cố niềm tin của người tiêu dùng. | An Open Approach to Sustainability Sustainable design relies on assessments of goods and services -information that can only be amassed through the combined efforts of many people familiar with supply chains. The disclosure of suppliers and processes is a reality for many industries where it serves to ensure quality and bolster consumer confidence. In others competitors work together to prevent quality and dependability problems by auditing shared suppliers. Communicating supply chain practices can push for quality improvements and help identify efficiencies in the sourcing shipping and reuse of materials. Certification and eco-labeling are useful in establishing best practices but they work through a closed system so it is impossible to verify or disseminate successful strategies. An open communications platform can gather the contributions of diverse groups including environmental and supply chain experts governments NGO s producers and other communities affected by industrial production. The multi-stakeholder approach has the potential to scale up monitoring and verification to account for more steps in supply chains. But the more powerful open approach depends on supply chain transparency only once companies begin to hare the information behind their supply chains will sustainable practices become the new standard for excellence. 92 Verification This thesis takes a democratic approach to sustainability assessment where individuals put forward their interpretations of impacts based on what they know about industrial supply chains. How can we know if individual assessments are accurate A crowd-sourced approach -like Wikipedia- is at risk of information vandalism. But the problem of Garbage in garbage out -that data is only as good as its source- also plagues private industry-funded sustainability assessments. Unlike proprietary studies an open source and open data approach makes it possible for the underlying raw data to be verified by third parties. In Wikipedia
