Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Richard M. Stallman (nhà phát minh của {Emacs}). Trong trái tim của tâm hồn, ước mơ của tin tặc nhất của một ngày nào đó trở thành demigods mình, và nhiều hơn một dự án phần mềm lớn đã được thúc đẩy để hoàn thành tác giả của hy vọng che kín mặt của phong thần. Xem thêm {net.god}, {true hacker}. : demo: / de'moh / [`trình diễn '] 1. v. | Information prepared by the Project Gutenberg legal advisor 80 Richard M. Stallman inventor of EMACS . In their hearts of hearts most hackers dream of someday becoming demigods themselves and more than one major software project has been driven to completion by the author s veiled hopes of apotheosis. See also net.god true-hacker . demo de moh short for demonstration 1. v. To demonstrate a product or prototype. A far more effective way of inducing bugs to manifest than any number of test runs especially when important people are watching. 2. n. The act of demoing. 3. n. Esp. as demo version can refer to either a special version of a program frequently with some features crippled which is distributed at little or no cost to the user for demonstration purposes. demo mode Sun n. 1. The state of being heads down in order to finish code in time for a demo usually due yesterday. 2. A mode in which video games sit there by themselves running through a portion of the game also known as attract mode . Some serious app s have a demo mode they use as a screen saver or may go through a demo mode on startup for example the Microsoft Windows opening screen --- which lets you impress your neighbors without actually having to put up with Microsloth Windows . demon n. 1. MIT A portion of a program that is not invoked explicitly but that lies dormant waiting for some condition s to occur. See daemon . The distinction is that demons are usually processes within a program while daemons are usually programs running on an operating system. Demons are particularly common in AI programs. For example a knowledge-manipulation program might implement inference rules as demons. Whenever a new piece of knowledge was added various demons would activate which demons depends on the particular piece of data and would create additional pieces of knowledge by applying their respective inference rules to the original piece. These new pieces could in turn activate more demons as the inferences .