Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
không giống như từ từ rút ra, khó khăn, dừng-và-đi, các phong trào bút không phù hợp và hình thành lá thư khác nhau được sản xuất bởi một thợ rèn đang cố gắng để bắt chước chữ viết của người khác. | are not like the slowly drawn awkward stop-and-go inconsistent pen movements and divergent letter formations produced by a forger trying to imitate the writing of someone else. But differentiating poorly written genuine writing features from the defective writing features of forgery is not always easy or possible. Success depends on many factors such as the volume of the questioned writing the volume of the exemplar writing and its closeness in date to the questioned writing and the conditions under which the questioned and exemplar writings were written. These features of genuine writing and forged writing help examiners answer Questions 1 and 2 that follow. The Examining Process Using the unaided eye in combination with the microscope the examiner compares the obvious and the inconspicuous writing features in the questioned writing with the writing features in the exemplar writing. These features include letter shapes letter sizes letter heights the height relationships of letters writing slant the direction and shape of beginning and terminal strokes letter connections letter disconnections pen pressure and smoothness of pen movement. In brief the examiner compares all of the features that make up the questioned writing and the exemplar writing. The examiner looks for combinations of significant similarities and combinations of significant differences between the questioned writing and the exemplar writing. If the examiner finds combinations of significant similarities between the questioned and exemplar writing and if there occur no significant differences then it becomes increasingly likely that the questioned writing and the exemplar writing were written by the same person. At the end of the study after all of the evidence has been evaluated the examiner might conclude that the person who wrote the exemplars was in fact the person who wrote the questioned writing or in the case of a questioned signature that the questioned signature is genuine. But if .
