Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ
Tải xuống
Tham khảo tài liệu 'kaplan gmat 800 frist part 5', ngoại ngữ, ngữ pháp tiếng anh phục vụ nhu cầu học tập, nghiên cứu và làm việc hiệu quả | Generated by Foxit PDF Creator Foxit Software http www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Explanation Market Protection Mechanism Distinguishing Feature Causation 22. The president of country Y is sure having a hard time of it being shot at and all. No matter. The real issue here is this electronic market regulation gizmo that s supposed to help the country avoid a major economic disaster. Our job is to draw a conclusion about it. There s a lot going on here so let s recap Roughly every 50 years country Y experiences political instability. The reaction of average investors to such crises cannot be predicted so a crisis leads to or causes uncertainty. Country Y has created an electronic protection mechanism for its financial market that relies on estimates of how average investors will react to changes in corporate data and economic indicators. The purpose of the mechanism is to avoid a major market selloff. The correct answer will draw an inference that logically connects the different ideas stated in the evidence. It s difficult to prephrase the correct answer here so your best bet is to test the choices rigorously looking for the one that absolutely must be true. A goes too far in its inference that an attempt on the president s life will happen within 50 years. The 1992 attempt was only an example of the political instability that occurs roughly every 50 years and the 50-year period was an average not an absolute limit. Furthermore even if there is an attempt on the president s life it is unclear how investors will react because their behavior in such situations cannot be predicted in advance. For all we know the market will go up and the mechanism will not be needed. B goes beyond the scope of the argument. Whether investors perceive sudden political events positively or negatively isn t mentioned in the stimulus so we can t infer that that perception makes any difference to the accuracy of the mechanism. C draws a reasonable conclusion based on the .
