tailieuchung - Differences in classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: A cross-sectional analyses

Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Differences in classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: A cross-sectional analyses

Hải Vân 44 5 pdf

Đang chuẩn bị nút TẢI XUỐNG, xin hãy chờ Tải xuống

The GOLD 2011 document proposed a new classification system for COPD combining symptom assessment by COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores, and exacerbation risk. We postulated that classification of COPD would be different by the symptom scale; CAT vs mMRC. |

Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu:
Differences in classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: A cross-sectional analyses

British and american english pronunciation differences

Personality Individual Differences and Intelligenc

Asexual morphological differences in male and female plants of Commiphora wightii (Arn.) Bhandari - An endangered medicinal plant

A longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditorsA longitudinal study of audit quality differences among independent auditors

Gender and locale differences in guidance needs among adolescents

Research " Differences in Audit Quality Among Audit Firms: An Examination Using Bid-Ask Spreads "

Childhood Health And Differences In Late-life Health Outcomes Between England And The United States

Báo cáo khoa học: "A Quantitative Analysis of Lexical Differences Between Genders in Telephone Conversations"

Chủ đề nói tiếng Anh: Topic 1 - Differences betweeen urban and rural

Inflammatory bowel disease: A global perspective

Đang chuẩn bị liên kết để tải về tài liệu: Differences in classification of COPD group using COPD assessment test (CAT) or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores: A cross-sectional analyses