TAILIEUCHUNG - AELE MONTHLY LAW JOURNAL

As even these preliminary comments should indicate, Hollywood has experienced a rich and dynamic history. The aim of this chapter is to chart that history in more detail and also to trace the efforts of film crit- ics and scholars to make sense of it. Journalistic film criticism dates back to Hollywood’s earliest years, and the film industry always has been subject to heavy coverage in both the trade and popular press. But the systematic scholarly study of Hollywood did not really take hold, interestingly enough, until after Hollywood’s postwar collapse. Not until the studio system and classical era were pronounced dead, in other words, were scholars and academics. | AELE Home Page Publications Menu Seminar Information AELE Monthly Law Journal Cite as 2007 4 AELE Mo. L. J. 501 Special Articles Section - April 2007 Use of Force and The Hollywood Factor By Jeffry L. Johnson Contents The Standard Who Decides Why So Critical Policing in the Video Age The Hollywood Factor The Demonstrative Bullet Fallacy The Code of the West Violent Police - Violent Business Bridging the Gap The Heart of the Problem What is the difference between reasonable police force and excessive force Who decides where one ends and the other begins How objective is the standard What influences impact that standard This article will examine conflicting views of reasonable force identify and isolate particular factors that have created and perpetuated this growing conflict specifically between police and community members. It will also attempt to identify how police managers can make that standard more objective fair and understandable to both officers as well as civilians particularly those civilians who directly make and influence judgments of officer conduct in force incidents. THE STANDARD We know that California law like most states allows officers to use reasonable force when attempting to apprehend a The US Supreme 1 California Penal Code 835a. Court has further defined the reasonableness standard for all states in Graham v. This 1989 landmark case mandated that the determination of objective reasonableness must be judged from the perspective of the officer on the scene allowing for the fact that force situations often call for split-second decisions and must be reviewed without regard to the officer s underlying intent or motivation. The Court expressly understood and stated that not every push or shove even if it may later seem unnecessary in the peace of a judge s chambers 3 is unreasonable in the final analysis if we are judging it through the eyes of the officer at the scene. Translation No Monday morning quarterbacking should be .

TỪ KHÓA LIÊN QUAN
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.