TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 12 P46

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 12 P46 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW ROE V. WADE 437 live came into conflict with family privacy. The Gleitmans contended that their doctor failed to warn that Mrs. Gleitman was suffering from German measles and this failure deprived the family of the opportunity of terminating the pregnancy. They alleged the child was born with grave defects as a result of the doctor s omission. The court stated as follows The right to life is inalienable in our society. We are not faced here with the necessity of balancing the mother s life against that of her child. The sanctity of the single human life is the decisive factor in this suit in tort. Eugenic considerations are not controlling. We are not talking here about the breeding of prize cattle. It may have been easier for the mother and less expensive for the father to have terminated the life of their child while he was an embryo but these alleged detriments cannot stand against the preciousness of a single human life to support a remedy in tort. 227 at 693. B. Physician-patient relationship Proponents of abortion-on-demand assert that antiabortion laws unlawfully intrude into the privacy of the physician-patient relationship. They assume necessarily that the doctor treating a pregnancy owes an obligation of good medical care to only one patient the pregnant woman. In Jones v. Jones 208 Misc. 721 144 . 820 spout. 1955 the court stated concerning an unborn child as follows . became a patient of the mother s obstetrician as well as the mother herself. In so holding I can think of the infant as a third-party beneficiary of the mother-doctor contract or perhaps a principal for whom the mother acted as agent. 144 at 826. As a patient of the obstetrician the child may recover damages for a prenatal injury suffered as the result of the negligence of his doctor. Sylvia v. Gobeille 101 . 76 220 222 1966 Seattle-First National Bank v. Rankin Wash. 2d 288 367 835 1962 . It is elemental that a doctor cannot be .

• Lĩnh vực khác
• Từ điển ngành luật
• thuật ngữ pháp lý
• luật pháp Hoa Kỳ
• các đạo luật
• điều khoản pháp lý
• luật dân sự
• luật liên bang
• văn bản pháp luật
• tài liệu pháp lý
• Từ điển tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn theo chủ đề
• Tiếng Hàn căn bản
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về chuyên ngành Luật
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về xã hội