TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 12 P41

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 12 P41 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN 387 respondent if he believed that he allowed the Police Department to do the things that the paper say he did. But neither this witness nor any of the others testified that he had actually believed the statements in their supposed reference to respondent. The cost of the advertisement was approximately 4800 and it was published by the Times upon an order from a New York advertising agency acting for the signatory Committee. The agency submitted the advertisement with a letter from A. Philip Randolph Chairman of the Committee certifying that the persons whose names appeared on the advertisement had given their permission. Mr. Randolph was known to the Times Advertising Acceptability Department as a responsible person and in accepting the letter as sufficient proof of authorization it followed its established practice. There was testimony that the copy of the advertisement which accompanied the letter listed only the 64 names appearing under the text and that the statement We in the south warmly endorse this appeal and the list of names thereunder which included those of the individual petitioners were subsequently added when the first proof of the advertisement was received. Each of the individual petitioners testified that he had not authorized the use of his name and that he had been unaware of its use until receipt of respondent s demand for a retraction. The manager of the Advertising Acceptability Department testified that he had approved the advertisement for publication because he knew nothing to cause him to believe that anything in it was false and because it bore the endorsement of a number of people who are well known and whose reputation he had no reason to question. Neither he nor anyone else at the Times made an effort to confirm the accuracy of the advertisement either by checking it against recent Times news stories relating to some of the described events or by any other means. Alabama law denies a .

TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.