TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 11 P39

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 11 P39 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW KELO V. CITY OF NEW LONDON 367 New York . . Co. v. Offield 77 Conn. 417 421 59 A. 510 1904 in taking for railroad improvements court held t hat the uses to be furthered are public is a question the decision of which by the legislative department while not absolutely conclusive upon the judicial department . is entitled to very great weight . This court has continued to afford the public use clause a broad construction and repeatedly has embraced the purposive formulation first articulated in Olmstead v. Camp supra 33 Conn. at In Gohld Realty Co. v. Hartford supra 141 Conn. at 139 104 365 the owner of commercial real estate challenged the constitutionality of the eminent domain provisions of the redevelopment act under which land in blighted urban areas could be taken cleared and sold or leased to redevelopers. The property owner contended that use of eminent domain in this manner violated the public use clause of the state constitution. Id. at 141 104 365. Utilizing the purposive definition of public use from Olmstead v. Camp supra 33 Conn. at 546 this court relied on express legislative findings about the deleterious effects of urban blight and concluded that there can be no doubt that the elimination of such substandard insanitary deteriorated slum or blighted areas . is for the public welfare. Private property taken for the purpose of eradicating the conditions which obtain in such areas is taken for a public use. Gohld Realty Co. v. Hartford supra at 143 104 365. Moreover with respect to the provisions of the act allowing the taken land 32Prior to the urban renewal cases we note that this court has construed the phrase public purpose in the context of spending public moneys as synonymous with the term public use. In Barnes v. New Haven 140 Conn. 8 12-14 98 523 1953 a taxpayer challenged the validity of an act creating a parking authority as lacking a public purpose under the emoluments clause article first

• Lĩnh vực khác
• Từ điển ngành luật
• thuật ngữ pháp lý
• luật pháp Hoa Kỳ
• các đạo luật
• điều khoản pháp lý
• luật dân sự
• luật liên bang
• văn bản pháp luật
• tài liệu pháp lý
• Từ điển tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn theo chủ đề
• Tiếng Hàn căn bản
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về chuyên ngành Luật
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về xã hội