TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 12 P13

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 12 P13 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW MAPP V. OHIO 107 II. The Rule of Evidence Prevailing in the Courts of the State of Ohio that Confiscated Criminal Evidence Even Though Obtained Without A Search Warrant Therefor is Admissible in a Criminal Prosecution is Not in Conflict With Any Constitutional Provision The search warrant about which there is testimony in the record R. 34 did not cover the incriminating evidence subsequently found in the home of the appellant and upon which she was convicted. However there is nothing about this case that distinguishes it from any other criminal prosecution in so far as the application of the same rules of evidence is concerned. The Ohio courts justifiably relied upon the decision in State v. Lindway 131 O. S. 166 2 N. E. 2d 490 appeal dismissed and certiorari denied 299 U. S. 506 81 L. Ed. 375 57 S. Ct. 36 for guidance at the trial and on the appeal and held that the incriminating evidence found in the home of the appellant was competent and admissible though obtained without lawful process. And this Court has consistently held except where the illegal search involves an assault upon the person Rochin v. California 342 U. S. 165 96 L. Ed. 183 72 S. Ct. 205 25 A. L. R. 2d 1396 that in a prosecution in a state court for a state crime the 14th Amendment does not forbid the admission of evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure. Irvine v. California 347 U. s. 128 98 L. Ed. 561 74 S. Ct. 381 Wolf v. Colorado 338 U. S. 25 93 L. Ed. 1782 69 S. Ct. 1359 Breithaupt v. Abram 352 U. S. 432 1 L. Ed. 2d 448 77 S. Ct. 408. There is no sound reason for departing from the Lindway decision or modifying it in its application to this case as suggested by Judge Herbert in his dissenting opinion. As ground for modifying the Lindway rule Judge Herbert points out that the evidence did not disclose a commercial purpose in the possession of these books that no printing presses were found nor a sufficient volume of books to indicate the purpose of distribution .

• Lĩnh vực khác
• Từ điển ngành luật
• thuật ngữ pháp lý
• luật pháp Hoa Kỳ
• các đạo luật
• điều khoản pháp lý
• luật dân sự
• luật liên bang
• văn bản pháp luật
• tài liệu pháp lý
• Từ điển tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn theo chủ đề
• Tiếng Hàn căn bản
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về chuyên ngành Luật
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về xã hội