TAILIEUCHUNG - Gale Encyclopedia Of American Law 3Rd Edition Volume 11 P51

Gale Encyclopedia of American Law Volume 11 P51 fully illuminates today's leading cases, major statutes, legal terms and concepts, notable persons involved with the law, important documents and more. Legal issues are fully discussed in easy-to-understand language, including such high-profile topics as the Americans with Disabilities Act, capital punishment, domestic violence, gay and lesbian rights, physician-assisted suicide and thousands more. | MILESTONES IN THE LAW KELO V. CITY OF NEW LONDON 487 service in time of War or public danger nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself nor be deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. Emphasis added. It is the last of these liberties the Takings Clause that is at issue in this case. In my view it is imperative that the Court maintain absolute fidelity to the Clause s express limit on the power of the government over the individual no less than with every other liberty expressly enumerated in the Fifth Amendment or the Bill of Rights more generally. Shepard v. United States 544 . 13 28 125 . 1254 1264 161 205 2005 THOMAS J. concurring in part and concurring in judgment internal quotation marks omitted . Though one component of the protection provided by the Takings Clause is that the government can take private property only if it provides just compensation for the taking the Takings Clause also prohibits the government from taking property except for public use. Were it otherwise the Takings Clause would either be meaningless or empty. If the Public Use Clause served no function other than to state that the government may take property through its eminent domain power-for public or private uses-then it would be surplusage. See ante at 2672 O CONNOR J. dissenting see also Marbury v. Madison 1 Cranch 137 174 2 . 60 1803 It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect Myers v. United States 272 . 52 151 47 . 21 71 . 160 1926 . Alternatively the Clause could distinguish those takings that require compensation from those that do not. That interpretation however would permit private property to be taken or appropriated for private use without any compensation whatever. .

• Lĩnh vực khác
• Từ điển ngành luật
• thuật ngữ pháp lý
• luật pháp Hoa Kỳ
• các đạo luật
• điều khoản pháp lý
• luật dân sự
• luật liên bang
• văn bản pháp luật
• tài liệu pháp lý
• Từ điển tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn theo chủ đề
• Tiếng Hàn căn bản
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về chuyên ngành Luật
• Từ vựng tiếng Hàn về xã hội