TAILIEUCHUNG - Cú pháp tiếng anh part 22

The resulting VP is then merged with a null transitive light verb whose external AGENT argument is the pronoun il ‘he’; since the light-verb is affixal, it triggers movement of the verb commis ‘committed’ to adjoin to the light verb, so that at the end of the vP phase we have the structure (51) below: (51) PRN il v ø+commis V t vP v' VP QP quelle bêtise The light-verb agrees in person/number f-features with the object quelle bêtise ‘what blunder’ and assigns it accusative case. By hypothesis, the light verb has no [EPP] feature in wh-in-situ questions, so there. | 211 blunder . The resulting VP is then merged with a null transitive light verb whose external AGENT argument is the pronoun il he since the light-verb is affixal it triggers movement of the verb commis committed to adjoin to the light verb so that at the end of the vP phase we have the structure 51 below 51 il The light-verb agrees in person number f -features with the object quelle bêtise what blunder and assigns it accusative case. By hypothesis the light verb has no EPP feature in wh-in-situ questions so there is no movement of the wh-phrase quelle bêtise what blunder to spec-vP. Subsequently the vP 51 is merged as the complement of the auxiliary a has which agrees in person number f-features with and triggers movement to spec-TP of the subject il he . Merging the resulting TP with a null complementiser which likewise has no EPP feature derives the structure associated with 50a Il a commis quelle bêtise literally He has committed what blunder . Now consider the derivation of 50b . This is similar in a number of respects to that of 50a so that as before the light verb agrees in person and number with and assigns accusative case to its object quelle bêtise what blunder . But in addition the light-verb has WH EPP features and these attract the wh-marked object quelle bêtise what blunder to move to become an additional outer specifier for the vP so deriving the structure shown in 52 below The resulting vP 52 is then merged as the complement of the auxiliary a has which agrees in f -features with and triggers movement to spec-TP of the subject il he . Merging the resulting TP with a null interrogative complementiser which has EPP WH features triggers movement of the wh-phrase to spec-CP so deriving the structure associated with 50b Quelle bêtise il a commise literally What blunder he has committed In the light of the assumptions made above consider why the participle surfaces in the agreeing feminine singular form commise committed in 50b but in the non-agreeing .

TAILIEUCHUNG - Chia sẻ tài liệu không giới hạn
Địa chỉ : 444 Hoang Hoa Tham, Hanoi, Viet Nam
Website : tailieuchung.com
Email : tailieuchung20@gmail.com
Tailieuchung.com là thư viện tài liệu trực tuyến, nơi chia sẽ trao đổi hàng triệu tài liệu như luận văn đồ án, sách, giáo trình, đề thi.
Chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm liên quan đến các vấn đề bản quyền nội dung tài liệu được thành viên tự nguyện đăng tải lên, nếu phát hiện thấy tài liệu xấu hoặc tài liệu có bản quyền xin hãy email cho chúng tôi.
Đã phát hiện trình chặn quảng cáo AdBlock
Trang web này phụ thuộc vào doanh thu từ số lần hiển thị quảng cáo để tồn tại. Vui lòng tắt trình chặn quảng cáo của bạn hoặc tạm dừng tính năng chặn quảng cáo cho trang web này.