TAILIEUCHUNG - Bullied at school, bullied at work: A prospective study

The consequences of childhood bullying victimisation are serious. Much previous research on risk factors for being bullied has used a cross-sectional design, impeding the possibility to draw conclusions on causality, and has not considered simultaneous effects of multiple risk factors. | Andersen et al. BMC Psychology 2015 3 35 DOI S40359-015-0092-1 BMC Psychology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Bullied at school bullied at work a prospective study Lars Peter Andersen1 Merete Labriola2 3 Johan Hviid Andersen1 Thomas Lund1 3 and Claus D. Hansen4 Abstract Background The consequences of childhood bullying victimisation are serious. Much previous research on risk factors for being bullied has used a cross-sectional design impeding the possibility to draw conclusions on causality and has not considered simultaneous effects of multiple risk factors. Paying closer attention to multiple risk factors for being bullying can provide a basis for designing intervention programmes to prevent or reduce bullying among children and adolescents. Methods Risk factors for bullying were examined by using questionnaire data collected in 2004 and 2007. In 2004 the participants were aged 14-15 years and 17-18 years in 2007. The baseline questionnaire was answered by 3054 individuals in 2004 and 2181 individuals participated in both rounds. We analysed risk factors for being bullied at the individual and societal level. Information on the social background of the participants was derived from a national register at Statistics Denmark. Results Several risk factors were identified. Being obese low self-assessed position in school class overprotective parents low self-esteem low sense of coherence and low socioeconomic status were risk factors for being bullied at school. Being overweight smoking low self-assessed position in class low sense of coherence and low socioeconomic status were risk factors for being bullied at work. However most associations between risk factors in 2004 and being bullied in 2007 disappeared after adjustment for being bullied in 2004. Conclusions The strongest risk factor for being bullied was being previously bullied. Our results stress the importance of early prevention of bullying at schools. In addition attention should be drawn to the role

• Tâm lý học
• Bullying at school
• Bullying at work
• Risk factors
• Prospective study
• Multiple risk factors
• School bullying
• Associated factors among students aged
• School aged students
• Cyber bullying
• Reducing the effect of school bullying
• Parent–adolescent bonding
• Mental health problems
• Potentially protective factors
• Multivariate logistic regression analysis
• School victimization
• Posttraumatic stress disorder
• PTSD development
• PTSD clinic
• BMC Pediatrics
• Gatehouse bullying scale
• Student level variables
• School level variables
• Multi level models
• Adolescent psychiatry
• Mental health
• Traditional bullying
• Bully victims
• Tạp chí nghiên cứu y học
• School bullying and some associated factors among students aged
• Nghe An province
• Bullied among students
• Verbal bullying
• Theoretical analysis
• In depth interviews
• Social networking forums
• Brochure building activities
• make up
• mean teens
• social bullying
• social aggression
• trình bày báo cáo
• tài liệu báo cáo khoa học
• nghiên cứu y học
• báo cáo y học
• kiến thức y học
• Victimization and fighting
• Fighting in secondary school
• Gender based differences
• Children enrolled
• Victimization and fighting behaviour